Welcome to Law-Forums.org!   

Advertisments:




Sponsor Links:

Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts


Planck's Statements

Defamation Law Discussion Forum

Planck's Statements

Postby Cecillo » Sun Dec 04, 2016 6:33 am

Hey buddy,(term used extremely "loosely")

Who do you think you are ? ? ?

And since when is the policy of AllExperts(of which you certainly are not) a policy other than simply answering questions.  Since when is it AllExperts policy to slander people and display their disgusting slander on the internet ? ? ?  buddy, your actions are disgusting.

And if Velocity of Light = Frequency x Wavelength, then Energy = mass(Frequency x Wavelength)squared.  So quit dispersing lies about Planck's claims saying that he claimed no such thing.  Why not just do the world a favor and immensely improve the integrity of AllExperts and get off their respected platform.  Your choice of name is repugnant and surely a display of your cowardness.

Good Night, . . . buddy.

buddy wrote at:  http://en.allexperts.com/q/Physics-1358/2010/1/EinsteinGravity-com.htm

I can assure that, if Al Zeeper is as ignorant of physics as he was when he wrote the page

then he is INCREDIBLY ignorant. Amongst the incredibly stupid things Mr. Zeeper writes are

"According to Max Planck,

E = mass x(Wavelength x Frequency)2"

Planck said no such thing.

"An object cannot obtain a Velocity without first Accelerating."

Actually, photons go to the speed of light without any acceleration whatsoever.

"Mass of the photon(m = E / c2)  = 3.98328720067195 x 10-20 Kg."

Actually, we know for an absolute fact that the mass of a photon can be no larger than 10^-51 gm, or 10^-48 Kg. www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html

So Mr. Zeeper is off by a factor of 10000000000000000000000000000.

Anytime someone publishes on the Internet -- but not in scientific journals -- an article which start with the claim that it is "the biggest Physics discovery in  104  years", then I feel safe in thinking that the person is either an idiot or hoping to attract the attention of idiots.
Cecillo
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:26 pm

Planck's Statements

Postby kennon » Sun Dec 04, 2016 8:59 pm

Hey buddy,(term used extremely "loosely")

Who do you think you are ? ? ?

And since when is the policy of AllExperts(of which you certainly are not) a policy other than simply answering questions.  Since when is it AllExperts policy to slander people and display their disgusting slander on the internet ? ? ?  buddy, your actions are disgusting.

And if Velocity of Light = Frequency x Wavelength, then Energy = mass(Frequency x Wavelength)squared.  So quit dispersing lies about Planck's claims saying that he claimed no such thing.  Why not just do the world a favor and immensely improve the integrity of AllExperts and get off their respected platform.  Your choice of name is repugnant and surely a display of your cowardness.

Good Night, . . . buddy.

buddy wrote at:  http://en.allexperts.com/q/Physics-1358/2010/1/EinsteinGravity-com.htm

I can assure that, if Al Zeeper is as ignorant of physics as he was when he wrote the page

then he is INCREDIBLY ignorant. Amongst the incredibly stupid things Mr. Zeeper writes are

"According to Max Planck,

E = mass x(Wavelength x Frequency)2"

Planck said no such thing.

"An object cannot obtain a Velocity without first Accelerating."

Actually, photons go to the speed of light without any acceleration whatsoever.

"Mass of the photon(m = E / c2)  = 3.98328720067195 x 10-20 Kg."

Actually, we know for an absolute fact that the mass of a photon can be no larger than 10^-51 gm, or 10^-48 Kg. www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html

So Mr. Zeeper is off by a factor of 10000000000000000000000000000.

Anytime someone publishes on the Internet -- but not in scientific journals -- an article which start with the claim that it is "the biggest Physics discovery in  104  years", then I feel safe in thinking that the person is either an idiot or hoping to attract the attention of idiots.
kennon
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 5:08 pm

Planck's Statements

Postby Dolan » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:19 am

As I have stated already, if anyone can show me, in a book or a paper written by Max Planck, that he did indeed make such a statement, or anything remotely like this, I will, on this forum, admit my mistake. It MUST be a published article or book, and it MUST be authored by Max Planck. A statement along the lines of "Max Planck said this at one point." Otherwise I can just as easily(and falsely) say, "Al Zeeper claimed that he created his internet site in order to get attention from idiots."

I will, however, in all fairness, ask that you reciprocate. If you FAIL to provide any evidence that a published work by Max Planck made such a statement, then YOU must admit, on this forum that YOU are mistaken and that I am correct in stating that Planck said no such thing.

I make two VERY public predictions:

1) you will fail in my challenge. You will NOT be able to find a published work, authored by Max Planck, in which this statement is made.

2) you will not admit your error.

As to why I responded in the way I did, the answer is simple: I was asked to do so. More specifically, I was asked for my opinion on the URL, and I gave it. Unless you, or anyone else, can name a published work authored by Max Planck that has him saying that, I will continue to assert that he said no such thing.

It is VERY telling that you make no objection to my statement that Mr. Zeeper is WAY off in his statement about photon mass. Just admit I'm right and Mr. Zeeper is wrong on this, okay?
Dolan
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 6:48 pm


Return to Defamation Law

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
cron